|
KMID : 0362120200420040379
|
|
Journal of Technologic Dentistry
2020 Volume.42 No. 4 p.379 ~ p.387
|
|
|
Satisfaction and quality recognition of face-to-face and non-face-to-face lectures among students in the departments of dental technology and dental hygiene
|
|
Kim Chang-Hee
Kim Hyeong-Mi
Kwon Eun-Ja
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
Purpose: This study aimed to explore methods to improve the quality recognition and satisfactionlevel of non-face-to-face lectures among students in the departments of dentaltechnology and dental hygiene.
Methods: This survey was conducted to assess the status and preference of non-face-tofacelectures and the level of awareness and satisfaction regarding the quality of theselectures among 179 students of dental technology and 295 students of dental hygiene.
Statistical analyses were performed using frequency analysis, independent sample t-test,one-way ANOVA (post-hoc Duncan), Welch analysis (post-hoc Games-Howell), and hierarchicalmultiple regression analysis.
Results: Factors that affected the ability to assess the quality of non-face-to-face lectureswere the department, the method of non-face-to-face lectures, the most preferred methodfor conducting lectures, the level of awareness regarding the quality of face-to-face lecture,and satisfaction level. It has 71.5% explanatory power. Moreover, factors that influenced thesatisfaction level of non-face-to-face lectures included the department, grade, the highestsatisfied non-face-to-face teaching method, the most effective theoretical non-face-to-faceteaching method, the most preferred teaching methods, and the ability to assess quality offace-to-face lectures. It has 46.8% explanatory power.
Conclusion: Non-face-to-face classes should be designed and developed for web-based programsto improve the motivation and achievement level of the students and encourage interactionbetween the professors and students. Our findings suggest that educators shouldstrive to achieve optimal educational effects by efficiently combining face-to-face and nonface-to-face lectures.
|
|
|
KEYWORD
|
|
|
Lecture, Non-face-to-face lectures, Recognition of the quality, Satisfaction level
|
|
|
FullTexts / Linksout information
|
|
|
|
|
|
Listed journal information
|
|
|
|